Why would the presence of an interviewer make it difficult for respondents to give honest answers?

1. Hyman HH, Cobb WJ, Feldman JJ, et al. Interviewing in Social Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1954. [Google Scholar]

2. Brenner M. Response-effects of ‘role restricted’ characteristics of the interviewer. In: Dijkstra W, van der Zouwen J, editors. Response Behaviour in the Survey-Interview. New York: Academic Press; 1982. pp. 91–130. [Google Scholar]

3. Groves RM. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2004. [Google Scholar]

4. Hagenaars JA, Heinen TG. Effects of role-independent interviewer characteristics on responses. In: Dijkstra W, van der Zouwen J, editors. Response Behaviour in the Survey-Interview. New York: Academic Press; 1982. pp. 91–130. [Google Scholar]

5. Dijkstra W. How interviewer variance can bias the results of research on interviewer effects. Qual Quant. 1983;17:179–87. [Google Scholar]

6. Davis DW, Silver BD. Stereotype threat and race of interviewer effects in a survey on political knowledge. Am J Pol Sci. 2003;47:33–45. [Google Scholar]

7. Krysan M, Couper MP. Race in the live and the virtual interview: racial deference, social desirability, and activation effects in attitude surveys. Soc Psychol Q. 2003;66:364–83. [Google Scholar]

8. Schuman H, Converse JM. The effects of Black and White interviewers on Black responses in 1968. Pub Opin Q. 1971;35:44–68. [Google Scholar]

9. Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K. The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]

10. Williams JA., Jr Interviewer role performance: a further note on bias in the information interview. Pub Opin Q. 1968;32:287–94. [Google Scholar]

11. Malat JR, van Ryn M, Purcell D. Race, socioeconomic status, and the perceived importance of positive self-presentation in health care. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2479–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Davis DW. Nonrandom measurement error and race of interviewer effects among African Americans. Pub Opin Q. 1997;61:183–207. [Google Scholar]

13. Groves RM, Magilavy LJ. Measuring and explaining interviewer effects in centralized telephone surveys. Pub Opin Q. 1986;50:251–66. [Google Scholar]

14. Freeman J, Butler EW. Some sources of interviewer variance in surveys. Pub Opin Q. 1976;40:79–91. [Google Scholar]

15. Dailey RM, Claus RE. The relationship between interviewer characteristics and physical and sexual abuse disclosures among substance users: a multilevel analysis. J Drug Issues. 2001;31:867–88. [Google Scholar]

16. Fendrich M, Johnson T, Shaligram C, et al. The impact of interviewer characteristics on drug use reporting by male juvenile arrestees. J Drug Issues. 1999;29:37–58. [Google Scholar]

17. Heeb JL, Gmel G. Interviewers’ and respondents’ effects on self-reported alcohol consumption in a Swiss health survey. J Stud Alcohol. 2001;62:434–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Kane EW, Macaulay LJ. Interviewer gender and gender attitudes. Pub Opin Q. 1993;57:1–28. [Google Scholar]

19. Wilson SR, Brown NL, Mejia C, et al. Effects of interviewer characteristics on reported sexual behavior of California Latino couples. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2002;24:38–62. [Google Scholar]

20. Groves RM, Fultz NH. Gender effects among telephone interviewers in a survey of economic attitudes. Sociol Methods Res. 1985;14:31–52. [Google Scholar]

21. Stock JS, Hochstim JR. A method of measuring interviewer variability. Pub Opin Q. 1951;15:322–34. [Google Scholar]

22. Becker S, Feyisetan K, Makinwa-Adebusoye P. The effect of the sex of interviewers on the quality of data in a Nigerian family planning questionnaire. Stud Fam Plann. 1995;26:233–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Carpenter JS, Andrykowski MA, Cordova MJ, et al. Do participants’ reports of symptom prevalence or severity vary by interviewer gender? Nurs Res. 1999;48:276–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Fry RPW, Rozewicz LM, Crisp AH. Interviewing for sexual abuse: reliability and effect of interviewer gender. Child Abuse Negl. 1996;20:725–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Landis JR, Sullivan D, Sheley J. Feminist attitudes as related to sex of the interviewer. Pac Sociol Rev. 1973;16:305–14. [Google Scholar]

26. Kish L. Studies of interviewer variance for attitudinal variables. J Am Stat Assoc. 1962;57:92–115. [Google Scholar]

27. Hanson RH, Marks ES. Influence of the interviewer on the accuracy of survey results. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:635–55. [Google Scholar]

28. Hox JJ, de Leeuw ED, Kreft IGG. The effect of interviewer and respondent characteristics on the quality of survey data: a multilevel model. In: Biemer PP, Groves RM, Lyberg LE, Mathiowetz NA, Sudman S, editors. Measurement Errors in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1991. pp. 439–61. [Google Scholar]

29. Summers GF, Hammonds AD. Effect of racial characteristics of investigator on self-enumerated responses to a Negro prejudice scale. Soc Forces. 1966;44:515–8. [Google Scholar]

30. Lenski GE, Leggett JC. Caste, class, and deference in the research interview. Am J Sociol. 1960;65:463–7. [Google Scholar]

31. Williams JA., Jr Interviewer-respondent interaction: a study of bias in the information interview. Sociometry. 1964;27:338–52. [Google Scholar]

32. Anderson BA, Silver BD, Abramson PR. The effects of the race of the interviewer on race-related attitudes of Black respondents in SRC/CPS National Election Studies. Pub Opin Q. 1988;52:289–324. [Google Scholar]

33. Campbell BA. Race-of-interviewer effects among Southern adolescents. Pub Opin Q. 1981;45:231–44. [Google Scholar]

34. Schaeffer NC. Evaluating race-of-interviewer effects in a national survey. Sociol Methods Res. 1980;8:400–19. [Google Scholar]

35. Freitag CB, Barry JR. Interaction and interviewer bias in a survey of the aged. Psychol Rep. 1974;34:771–4. [Google Scholar]

36. Hatchett S, Schuman H. White respondents and race-of-interviewer effects. Pub Opin Q. 1975–1976;39:523–8. [Google Scholar]

37. Welch S, Comer J, Steinman M. Interviewing in a Mexican-American community: an investigation of some potential sources of response bias. Pub Opin Q. 1973;37:115–26. [Google Scholar]

38. Carr LG. The Srole items and acquiescence. Am J Sociol. 1971;36:287–93. [Google Scholar]

39. Johnson TP, Parsons JA. Interviewer effects on self-reported substance use among homeless persons. Addict Behav. 1994;19:83–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Webster C. Hispanic and Anglo interviewer and respondent ethnicity and gender: the impact on survey response quality. J Mark Res. 1996;33:62–72. [Google Scholar]

41. Zimmerman MA, Caldwell CH, Bernat DH. Discrepancy between self-report and school-record grade point average: correlates with psychosocial outcomes among African American adolescents. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32:86–109. [Google Scholar]

42. Cotter PR, Cohen J, Coulter PB. Race-of-interviewer effects in telephone interviews. Pub Opin Q. 1982;46:278–84. [Google Scholar]

43. Finkel SE, Guterbock TM, Borg MJ. Race-of-interviewer effects in a preelection poll: Virginia 1989. Pub Opin Q. 1991;55:313–30. [Google Scholar]

44. Reese SD, Danielson WA, Shoemaker PJ, et al. Ethnicity-of-interviewer effects among Mexican-Americans and Anglos. Pub Opin Q. 1986;50:563–72. [Google Scholar]

45. Davis DW. The direction of race of interviewer effects among African-Americans: Donning the black mask. Am J Pol Sci. 1997;41:309–22. [Google Scholar]

46. Singer E, Frankel MR, Glassman MB. The effect of interviewer characteristics and expectations on response. Pub Opin Q. 1983;47:68–83. [Google Scholar]

47. Wolford ML, Brown RE, Marsden A, et al. Bias in telephone surveys of African Americans: the impact of perceived race of interviewer on responses. 1995 Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Orlando, FL. [Google Scholar]

48. Livert D, Kadushin C, Schulman M, et al. Do interviewer-respondent race effects impact the measurement of illicit substance use and related attitudes? 1998 Paper presented at the 53rd Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St Louis, MO. [Google Scholar]

49. Benney M, Riesman D, Star SA. Age and sex in the interview. Am J Sociol. 1956;62:143–52. [Google Scholar]

50. Colombotos J, Elinson J, Loewenstein R. Effect of interviewers’ sex on interview responses. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1969;47:227–31. [Google Scholar]

51. DeLamater JD. Methodological issues in the study of premarital sexuality. Sociol Methods Res. 1974;3:30–61. [Google Scholar]

52. Johnson WT, Delamater JD. Response effects in sex surveys. Pub Opin Q. 1976;40:165–81. [Google Scholar]

53. Hutchinson KL, Wegge DG. The effects of interviewer gender upon response in telephone survey-research. J Soc Behav Pers. 1991;6:573–84. [Google Scholar]

54. Johnson TP, Moore RW. Gender interactions between interviewer and survey respondents: issues of pornography and community standards. Sex Roles. 1993;28:243–61. [Google Scholar]

55. Grimes MD, Hansen GL. Response bias in sex-role attitude measurement. Sex Roles. 1984;10:67–72. [Google Scholar]

56. Lueptow LB, Moser SL, Pendleton BF. Gender and response effects in telephone interviews about gender characteristics. Sex Roles. 1990;22:29–42. [Google Scholar]

57. Pollner M. The effects of interviewer gender in mental health interviews. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186:369–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

58. Catania JA, Binson D, Canchola J, et al. Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item wording on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior. Pub Opin Q. 1996;60:345–75. [Google Scholar]

59. Huddy L, Billig J, Bracciodieta J, et al. The effect of interviewer gender on the survey response. Polit Behav. 1997;19:197–220. [Google Scholar]

60. Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Steiger DM. Humanizing self-administered surveys: experiments on social presence in Web and IVR surveys. Comput Hum Behav. 2003;19:1–24. [Google Scholar]

61. Ehrlich JS, Riesman D. Age and authority in the interview. Pub Opin Q. 1961;25:39–56. [Google Scholar]

62. Ford K, Norris AE. Effects of interviewer age on reporting of sexual and reproductive behavior of Hispanic and African American youth. Hisp J Behav Sci. 1997;19:369–76. [Google Scholar]

63. Stember H, Hyman H. Interviewer effects in the classification of responses. Pub Opin Q. 1949–1950;13:669–82. [Google Scholar]

64. Feldman JJ, Hyman H, Hart CW. A field study of interviewer effects on the quality of survey data. Pub Opin Q. 1951–1952;15:734–61. [Google Scholar]

65. Cleary PD, Mechanic D, Weiss N. The effect of interviewer characteristics on responses to a mental health interview. J Health Soc Behav. 1981;22:183–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

66. McGlone MS, Aronson J, Kobrynowicz D. Stereotype threat and the gender gap in political knowledge. Psychol Women Q. 2006;30:392–8. [Google Scholar]

67. Olson K, Peytchev A. Effect of interviewer experience on interview pace and interviewer attitudes. Pub Opin Q. 2007;71:273–86. [Google Scholar]

68. Benney M, Geiss P. Social class and politics in Greenwich. Br J Sociol. 1950;1:310–27. [Google Scholar]

69. Dohrenwend BS, Colombotos J, Dohrenwend BP. Social distance and interviewer effects. Pub Opin Q. 1968;32:410–22. [Google Scholar]

70. Katz D. Do interviewers bias poll results? Pub Opin Q. 1942;6:248–68. [Google Scholar]

71. Clarke P, Sproston K, Thomas R. An investigation into expectation-led interviewer effects in health surveys. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:2221–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

72. Krosnick JA, Alwin DF. An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Pub Opin Q. 1987;51:201–19. [Google Scholar]

73. Axinn WG. The influence of interviewer sex on responses to sensitive questions in Nepal. Soc Sci Res. 1991;20:303–18. [Google Scholar]

74. Weinreb AA. The limitations of stranger-interviewers in rural Kenya. Am Soc Rev. 2006;71:1014–39. [Google Scholar]

Page 2

Interviewer race and ethnicity effects studiesa