Why is it important to promote healthy eating in schools

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Dietary Guidelines. Canberra: Australian Government; 2013.

  2. Gill T, King L, Webb K. Best options for promoting healthy weight and preventing weight gain in NSW. Sydney: NSW Centre for Public Health Nutrition; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khambalia AZ, Dickinson S, Hardy LL, Gill T, Baur LA. A synthesis of existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of school-based behavioural interventions for controlling and preventing obesity. Obes Rev. 2012;13(3):214–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Popkin BM, Gordon-Larsen P. The nutrition transition: Worldwide obesity dynamics and their determinants. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:S2–9. Doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Neumark-Sztainer D, Wall M, Larson NI, Eisenberg ME, Loth K. Dieting and disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood: findings from a 10-year longitudinal study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(7):1004–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicklaus S, Remy E. Early origins of overeating: tracking between early food habits and later eating patterns. Curr Obes Rep. 2013;2(2):179–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee A. Health-promoting schools: evidence for a holistic approach to promoting health and improving health literacy. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2009;7(1):11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Making Education a Priority in the Post-2015 Development Agenda. Paris: UNESCO; 2013.

  9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6):e1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Health and Medical Research Council. Healthy eating for children. Teach your child healthy habits for a healthy life. Canberra: Australia: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2014.

  11. Hattie JA. Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van Sluijs EM, McMinn AM, Griffin SJ. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: Systematic review of controlled trials. BMJ. 2007;335(7622):703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994. p. 231–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen J. A power primer. Psyc Bul. 1992;112(1):155–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roe L, Hunt P, Bradshaw H, Rayner M. Health promotion interventions to promote healthy eating in the general population: a review. Health Promot Eff Rev. 1997;6:198.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell K, Waters E, O’Meara S, Summerbell C. Interventions for preventing obesity in childhood: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2001;2(3):149–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ammerman AS, Lindquist CH, Lohr KN, Hersey J. The efficacy of behavioural interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: a review of the evidence. Prev Med. 2002;35(1):25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burchett H. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among British primary school children: a review. Health Educ. 2003;103(2):99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Berti PR, Krasevec J, FitzGerald S. A review of the effectiveness of agriculture interventions in improving nutrition outcomes. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Knai C, Pomerleau J, Lock K, McKee M. Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2006;42(2):85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rasmussen M, Krolner R, Klepp KI, Lytle L, Brug J, Bere E, et al. Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature: Part I: quantitative studies. J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3(22):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sahay TB, Ashbury FD, Roberts M, Rootman I. Effective components for nutrition interventions: a review and application of the literature. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7(4):418–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Howerton MW, Bell BS, Dodd KW, Berrigan D, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Nebeling L. School-based nutrition programs produced a moderate increase in fruit and vegetable consumption: Meta and pooling analyses from 7 studies. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39(4):186–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oldroyd J, Burns C, Lucas P, Haikerwal A, Waters E. The effectiveness of nutrition interventions on dietary outcomes by relative social disadvantage: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(7):573–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Perez-Escamilla R, Hromi-Fiedler A, Vega-Lopez S, Bermudez-Millan A, Segura-Perez S. Impact of peer nutrition education on dietary behaviors and health outcomes among Latinos: a systematic literature review. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008;40(4):208–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Robinson-O’Brien R, Story M, Heim S. Impact of garden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: a review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(2):273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hingle MD, O’Connor TM, Dave JM, Baranowski T. Parental involvement in interventions to improve child dietary intake: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2010;51(2):103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Delgado-Noguera M, Tort S, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Bonfill X. Primary school interventions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2011;53(1–2):3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ganann R, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, Peirson L. Community-based interventions for enhancing to or consumption of fruit and vegetable among five to 18-year olds: a scoping review. BMC Pub Health. 2012;12:711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Govula C, Kattelman K, Ren C. Culturally appropriate nutrition lessons increased fruit and vegetable consumption in American Indian children. Topics in Clin Nutr. 2007;22(3):239–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Horne PJ, Tapper K, Lowe CF, Hardman CA, Jackson MC, Woolner J. Increasing children’s fruit and vegetable consumption: a peer-modelling and rewards-based intervention. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58(12):1649–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Baranowski T, Davis M, Resnicow K, Baranowski J, Doyle C, Lin LS, et al. Gimme 5 fruit, juice, and vegetables for fun and health: outcome evaluation. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(1):96–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. James J, Thomas P, Cavan D, Kerr D. Preventing childhood obesity by reducing consumption of carbonated drinks: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;328(1):1237–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor RW, McAuley KA, Barbezat W, Strong A, Williams SM, Mann JI. APPLE Project: 2-y findings of a community-based obesity prevention program in primary school age children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(3):735–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson RJ, Perez-Pozo SE, Sautin YY, Manitius J, Sanchez-Lozada LG, Feig DI, et al. Could excessive fructose intake and uric acid cause type 2 diabetes? Endocr Rev. 2009;30(1):96–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McAleese J, Rankin L. Garden-based nutrition education affects fruit and vegetable consumption in sixth-grade adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:662–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Blanchette L, Brug J. Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among 6–12-year-old children and effective interventions to increase consumption. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005;18:431–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Birch LL, McPhee L, Shoba BC, Pirok E, Steinberg L. What kind of exposure reduces children’s food neophobia? Looking vs tasting. Appetite. 1987;9:171–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Langellotto GA, Gupta A. Gardening increases vegetable consumption in school-aged children: a meta-analytical synthesis. Hort Tech. 2012;22(4):430–45.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Francis M, Nichols SSD, Dalrymple N. The effects of a school-based intervention programme on dietary intakes and physical activity among primary-school children in Trinidad and Tobago. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(5):738–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools. Paris: OECD; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Auld GW, Romaniello C, Heimendinger J, Hambidge C, Hambidge M. Outcomes from a school-based nutrition education program using resource teachers and cross-disciplinary models. J Nutr Educ. 1998;30(5):268–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bell CG, Lamb MW. Nutrition education and dietary behavior of fifth graders. J Nutr Educ. 1973;5:196–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Edwards CS, Hermann JR. Piloting a cooperative extension service nutrition education program on first-grade children’s willingness to try foods containing legumes. J Ext. 2011;49(1):1–4. Article 1IAW3 (Epublication).

  46. Fahlman MM, Dake JA, McCaughtry N, Martin J. A pilot study to examine the effects of a nutrition intervention on nutrition knowledge, behaviors, and efficacy expectations in middle school children. J Sch Health. 2008;78(4):216–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Friel S, Kelleher C, Campbell P, Nolan G. Evaluation of the Nutrition Education at Primary School (NEAPS) programme. Public Health Nutr. 1999;2(4):549–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gortmaker SL, Cheung LWY, Peterson KE, Chomitz G, Cradle JH, Dart H, et al. Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children: eat well and keep moving. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(9):975–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Liquori T, Koch PD, Contento IR, Castle J. The cookshop program: outcome evaluation of a nutrition education program linking lunchroom food experiences with classroom cooking experiences. J Nutr Educ. 1998;30(5):302–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Manios Y, Moschandreas J, Hatzis C, Kafatos A. Health and nutrition education in primary schools of Crete: changes in chronic disease risk factors following a 6-year intervention programme. Br J Nutr. 2002;88:315–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Morgan PJ, Warren JM, Lubans DR, Saunders KL, Quick GI, Collins CE. The impact of nutrition education with and without a school garden on knowledge, vegetable intake and preferences and quality of school life among primary-school students. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(11):1931–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Simons-Morton BG, Parcel GS, Baranowski T, Forthofer R, O’Hara NM. Promoting physical activity and a healthful diet among children: results of a school-based intervention study. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(8):986–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Agozzino E, Esposito D, Genovese S, Manzi E, Russo KP. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a nutrition education intervention performed by primary school teachers. Ital J Public Health. 2007;4(4):131–7.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Amaro S, Viggiano A, Di Costanzo A, Madeo I, Baccari ME, Marchitelli E, et al. Kaledo, a new educational board-game, gives nutritional rudiments and encourages healthy eating in children: a pilot cluster randomized trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165(9):630–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Anderson AS, Porteous LE, Foster E, Higgins C, Stead M, Hetherington M, et al. The impact of a school-based nutrition education intervention on dietary intake and cognitive and attitudinal variables relating to fruits and vegetables. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(6):650–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Bere E, Veierod MB, Bjelland M, Klepp KI. Outcome and process evaluation of a Norwegian school-randomized fruit and vegetable intervention: Fruits and Vegetables Make the Marks (FVMM). Health Educ Res. 2006;21(2):258–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Cooke LJ, Chambers LC, Anez EV, Croker HA, Boniface D, Yeomans MR, et al. Eating for pleasure or profit: the effect of incentives on children’s enjoyment of vegetables. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(2):190–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Day ME, Strange KS, McKay HA, Naylor P. Action schools! BC–healthy eating: effects of a whole-school model to modifying eating behaviours of elementary school children. Can J Public Health. 2008;99(4):328–31.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Domel SB, Baranowski T, Davis H, Thompson WO, Leonard SB, Riley P, et al. Development and evaluation of a school intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among 4th and 5th grade students. J Nutr Educ. 1993;25(6):345–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Duncan S, McPhee JC, Schluter PJ, Zinn C, Smith R, Schofield G. Efficacy of a compulsory homework programme for increasing physical activity and healthy eating in children: the healthy homework pilot study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Foster GD, Sherman S, Borradaile KE, Grundy KM, Vander Veur SS, Nachmani J, et al. A policy-based school intervention to prevent overweight and obesity. Pediatrics. 2008;121(4):e794–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gorely T, Nevill ME, Morris JG, Stensel DJ, Nevill A. Effect of a school-based intervention to promote healthy lifestyles in 7–11 year old children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Head MK. A nutrition education program at three grade levels. J Nutr Educ. 1974;6(56):59.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hendy HM, Williams KE, Camise TS. Kid’s Choice Program improves weight management behaviors and weight status in school children. Appetite. 2011;56(2):484–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hoffman JA, Franko DL, Thompson DR, Power TJ, Stallings VA. Longitudinal behavioral effects of a school-based fruit and vegetable promotion program. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010;35(1):61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kipping RR, Jago R, Lawlor DA. Diet outcomes of a pilot school-based randomised controlled obesity prevention study with 9–10 year olds in England. Prev Med. 2010;51(1):56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kristjansdottir AG, Johannsson E, Thorsdottir I. Effects of a school-based intervention on adherence of 7-9-year-olds to food-based dietary guidelines and intake of nutrients. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(8):1151–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, Nader PR, Parcel GS, Stone EJ, et al. Outcomes of a field trial to improve children’s dietary patterns and physical activity: the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health CATCH collaborative group. JAMA. 1996;275(10):768–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Mangunkusumo RT, Brug J, De Koning HJ, Van Der Lei J, Raat H. School-based internet-tailored fruit and vegetable education combined with brief counselling increases children’s awareness of intake levels. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10(3):273–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Muth ND, Chatterjee A, Williams D, Cross A, Flower K. Making an IMPACT: effect of a school-based pilot intervention. N C Med J. 2008;69(6):432–40.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Panunzio MF, Antoniciello A, Pisano A, Dalton S. Nutrition education intervention by teachers may promote fruit and vegetable consumption in Italian students. Nutr Res. 2007;27(9):524–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Parcel GS, Simons-Morton B, O’Hara NM, Baranowski T, Wilson B. School promotion of healthful diet and physical activity: impact on learning outcomes and self-reported behavior. Health Educ Q. 1989;16(2):181–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Parmer SM, Salisbury-Glennon J, Shannon D, Struempler B. School gardens: an experiential learning approach for a nutrition education program to increase fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption among second-grade students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41(3):212–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Perry CL, Bishop DB, Taylor G, Murray DM, Mays RW, Dudovitz BS, et al. Changing fruit and vegetable consumption among children: the 5-a-Day Power Plus Program in St. Paul, Minnesota. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(4):603–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Perry CL, Mullis R, Maile M. Modifying eating behavior of children: a pilot intervention study. J Sch Health. 1985;55(10):399–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Powers AR, Struempler BJ, Guarino A, Parmer SM. Effects of a nutrition education program on the dietary behavior and nutrition knowledge of second-grade and third-grade students. J Sch Health. 2005;75(4):129–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Quinn LJ, Horacek TM, Castle J. The impact of COOKSHOP on the dietary habits and attitudes of fifth graders. Top Clin Nutr. 2003;18(1):42–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Resnicow K, Davis M, Smith M, Baranowski T, Lin LS, Baranowski J, et al. Results of the TeachWell worksite wellness program. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(2):250–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Reynolds KD, Franklin FA, Binkley D, Raczynski JM, Harrington KF, Kirk KA, et al. Increasing the fruit and vegetable consumption of fourth graders: results from the high 5 project. Prev Med. 2000;30(4):309–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Sahota P, Rudolf MC, Dixey R, Hill AJ, Barth JH, Cade J. Randomised controlled trial of primary school based intervention to reduce risk factors for obesity. BMJ. 2001;323(7320):1029–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Shannon B, Chen AN. A three-year school-based nutrition education study. J Nutr Educ. 1988;20(34):114–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Smolak L, Levine MP, Schermer F. A controlled evaluation of an elementary school primary prevention program for eating problems. J Psychosom Res. 1998;44(3–4):339–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Spiegel SA, Foulk D. Reducing overweight through a multidisciplinary school-based intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2006;14(1):88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Te Velde SJ, Brug J, Wind M, Hildonen C, Bjelland M, Perez-Rodrigo C, et al. Effects of a comprehensive fruit-and vegetable-promoting school-based intervention in three European countries: the Pro children study. Br J Nutr. 2008;99(4):893–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 


Page 2

Author, Year, Country, Funding agency Design, Dominant/Theory Framework* Sample Treatment Length Teaching Strategy/Approach Coupled with Physical Activity Coupled with Specially-resourced teachers Relevant Outcome Categories Statistical Significance (p value /95% CI) Effect Size (Cohen’s d )
M 1 - M 2/SDpooled
Randomised Controlled Trials
Francis et al. (2010) Trinidad & Tobago, Self-funded [40] RCT/NR 579 x Grade 6 students 32 weeks (Curriculum approach) Bloom’s mastery learning model X Children’s Eating Attitude Test-26 (M) <0.05 0.20
Mean age: 10.4 yrs Self Report
SLB consumption (Servings/wk) NS −0.42
Fried food consumption (Servings/day) 0.04 −0.21
HFSS food consumption (<502 kJ/day) NS −0.21
Quasi-experimental Trials
Auld et al. (1998) USA, Kraft Foods [43] QE/SCT, CDT 851 x Grades K-5 students 4 years Cross-curricular & experiential learning X FV Consumption (Plate waste) <.001 Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: NR Self-efficacy (Likert scale)
- Food prep <.01
- Eating FV <.01
4th/5th Grade Knowledge (Test)
- Food Pyramid <.001
- Ingredients <.001
Bell & Lamb (1973) USA, Dairy Council Inc [44] QE/NR 1913 x Grade 5 students 6 weeks Popham Instruction Model (Define behavioural objectives, Diagnose student needs, Present learning opportunities, Evaluate attainment) X X Milk consumption (oz.) NS Insufficient data reported for calculation
Vegetable consumption (oz.) .05
Mean age: NR Nutrition knowledge (Test) .001
Edwards & Hermann (2011) USA, NR [45] QE/NR 11 x Grade 1 students 3 weeks Literary abstraction X X Legume taking (Number) .05 Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: NR Legume tasting (Number) .14
Fahlman et al. (2008) USA, NR [46] QE/NR 576 x students 4 weeks (Curriculum approach) adapted Health Belief Model X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake
Mean age: 12.2 yrs - Grain consumption (Servings/day) NS −0.08
- Fruit consumption(Servings/day) .047 0.97
- Vegetable consumption (Servings/day) .018 0.49
- Dairy consumption (Servings/day) NS 0.02
- Meat consumption (Servings/day) NS −0.02
Self Efficacy (Likert scale)
- Eat more FV NS 1.11
- Eat less fat NS −0.15
- Drink less SLB NS −0.05
- Eat healthy at FF restaurants NS 1.30
Friel et al. (1999) Ireland, Dept of Health [47] QE/SLT 821 x Grades 3–4 students 10 weeks Cross-curricular X Food Pairing Questionnaire
Mean age: NR - Behaviour <.01 0.72
- Preference <.01 1.00
- Knowledge NS −0.29
Gortmaker et al. (1999) USA, Walton Family Foundation [48] QE/SCT BCT 336 x Grades 4–5 students 2 years Cross-curricular (Math, science, language, social studies, physical education) coupled with a Social Marketing Approach X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: 9.1 yrs - Energy from fat (%) .04
- FV consumption (Servings/4184 kJ) .01
- Vitamin C (mg/4184 kJ) .01
Govula et al. (2007) USA, NR [30] QE/NR 33 x Grade 3 students 6 weeks (Curriculum approach) MyPyramid and Medicine Wheel Nutrition for Native Americans X X Block Kids Fruit/Vegetable recall
- F&V consumption (Servings/per day) .010 .10
Mean age: NR Culturally appropriate lessons - Fruit consumption (Servings/per day) .519 −0.26
- Vegetable consumption (Servings/per day) <.001 1.04
Knowledge Questionnaire (% correct) <.001 Insufficient data
Horne et al. (2004) UK, Horticultural Development Council, Fresh Produce Consortium, ASDA, Co-operative Group, Safeway, Sainsbury, Somerfield, Tesco, Bird’s Eye [31] QE/SLT 749 x Grades K-6 students 16 weeks Animation abstraction and contingent reinforcement for F&V consumption X X Consumption based on teacher visual estimates
Mean age: NR - 5-7 yr/old fruit (%) <.002 2.12
- 5-7 yr/old vegetable (%) NR 2.01
- 7-11 yr/old fruit (%) <.002 2.36
- 7-11 yr/old vegetable (%) NR 1.51
Liquori et al. (1998) USA, NR [49] QE/SCT 590 x Grades K-6 students 1 year Experiential learning (Cooking, environment and community garden) X Food intake based on teacher visual estimates (%) Grd K-3 Grd 4–6 Grd K-3 Grd 4-6
<.01 NS −1.90 −2.03
Mean age: NR Self report
- Preference for plant food <.001 <.001 2.51 0.00
- Attitudes NS NS 0.59 0.04
- Knowledge <.05 <.001 1.98 1.94
- Self efficacy in cooking NS <.05 0.79 0.70
- Food intentions <.01 NS 0.63 −0.17
- Paired food choice <.01 NS 1.58 −0.06
Manios et al. (2002), Greece, Kellogg’s, Greek Ministry of Sport, Greek Ministry of Education [50] QE/NR 1006 x Grade 1 students 6 years (Curriculum approach) Literary abstraction Parental reporting (Food Diary)
Age range: 5.5-6.5 yrs - Energy (kJ) <.05 −0.38
- Total fat (g) <.05 −0.38
- Protein (g) <.05 −0.42
- Carbohydrate (g) NS −0.23
McAleese & Rankin (2007), USA, NR [36] QE/NR 99 x Grade 6 students 12 weeks (Curriculum approach) Nutrition in the Garden X X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake
Mean age: 11.11 yrs Experiential learning (School garden) - Fruit (Servings/day) <.001 1.17
- Vegetables (Servings/day) <.001 0.92
- Vitamin A (μg/day) .004 0.20
- Vitamin C (mg/day) .016 0.49
- Fibre (g/day) .001 0.56
Morgan et al. (2010) Australia, Hunter Medical Research, Coles [51] QE/SCT 127 x Grades 5–6 students 10 weeks (Curriculum approach) Nutrition in the Garden – Modified X X FV knowledge (Gimme 5 Questionnaire) <.02 Insufficient data reported for calculation
Age range: 11-12 yrs Experiential learning (School garden) 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake .22
- Vegetable intake (Servings/day) .23
- Fruit intake (Servings/day)
Simmons-Morton et al. (1991), USA, HHLBI Grant [52] QE/SCT 135 x Grades K-4 students) 40 weeks (Curriculum approach) Behaviour-based Health & Physical Education 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake
Mean age: NR (Canteen) New School Lunch - Analysis of tray lunch (% kcals) <.05 −0.10
- Analysis of bag lunch (% kcals) <.05 0.03
Cluster-Controlled Trials
Agozzino et al. (2007), Italy, NR [53] CT/CogT 570 x students (30 x 4 & 5 grade classes) 40 weeks (Curriculum approach) Didactic-approach to health education X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
- Breakfast consumption (Sufficient) <.001
- Meat consumption (Sufficient) .003
- Fish consumption (Sufficient) .02
- Pulse consumption (Sufficient) .003
- Vegetable consumption (Sufficient) <.001
Amaro et al. (2005), Italy, Amici di Raoul Follereau (AIFO) [54] CT/NR 241 x students Mean age: 12.4 yrs 24 weeks Kalèdo Board Game (15-30mins play time p/w) X X Nutritional knowledge (31 items) <0.05 Insufficient data reported for calculation
BMI (z-score) NS
Anderson et al. (2005), UK, Food Standards Agency [55] CT/TPB 129 x Grades 1–6 students 36 weeks (Curriculum approach) based on experiential learning, video & literary abstraction X X Cognitive & attitudinal (Likert scale)
Mean age: 8.5 yrs Marketing and canteen provisions - Diet heart disease knowledge .001 0.24
- Preference for HFSS foods .034 −0.32
3-day food diary
- FV consumption (g) .617 0.07
- Energy (kJ) .327 0.00
- Sucrose (g) .578 0.01
Baronowski et al. (2000), USA, NR [32] CT/SCT 3347 x Grades 4–6 students 12 weeks (Curriculum approach) Gimme 5 X X 7-day food record
Mean age: NR Experiential learning, goal setting & problem solving, contingent reinforcement for F&V consumption - FV consumption (Servings) <.05 0.03
- Vegetable consumption(Servings) <.01 0.00
Questionnaire (Likert scale)
- Self efficacy (Eating FV) <.10 0.02
- Social norms <.10 0.00
- Asking behaviour <.05 0.06
- Knowledge <.05 0.05
Bere et al. (2006), Norway, Norwegian Research Council [56] CT/SCT 369 x Grade 6 students 28 weeks (Curriculum approach) National Curriculum X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: 11.3 yrs Experiential learning (Cooking/Food Prep) - FV consumption (Servings per day) .41
Curriculum enjoyment (Likert scale) .004
Cooke (2011), UK, Medical Research Council National Prevention Research Initiative [57] CT/mixed 442 x Kindergarten students 2 weeks Contingent reinforcement for vegetable tasting X X Liking of vegetables (Likert scale) .001 Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: 6 yrs Intake of vegetables .001
Day et al. (2008), Canada, NR [58] CT/NR 444 x Grades 4–5 students 12 weeks Integrates classroom learning, environmental change strategies, and a family/community component to promote the consumption of FV X X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake
Mean age: 10.0 yrs - Fruit consumption (Servings) <.05 −0.04
- Vegetable consumption (Servings) NS −0.05
- F V consumption (Servings) <.05 −0.06
- Variety of FV consumption (Servings) <.05 −0.01
Domel et al. (1993) USA, The International Apple Institute [59] CT/SCT 301 x Grades 4–5 students 6 weeks “5 a Day - for Better Health” X X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake
- F V consumption (Servings) NS 0.47
- Fruit consumption (Servings) .001 0.74
- Juice consumption (Servings) NS −0.14
- Vegetable consumption (Servings) .018 0.28
- Legume consumption (Servings) NS 0.45
Questionnaire (Likert scale)
- Fruit .046 0.35
- Vegetables NS 0.32
FV Knowledge (Multiple choice score) <.001 0.59
Duncan et al. (2011) New Zealand, Health Research Council NZ [60] CT/NR 97 x Grades 5–6 students 6 weeks Curriculum approach with “Healthy Homework” Teaching Resource X Food Diaries   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: NR Experiential learning (Cooking) - Fruit consumption (Servings/per day) NS
- Vegetable consumption (Servings/per day) .016
- Unhealthy food consumption (Servings per/day) .042
- Unhealthy drink consumption (Servings/per day) NS
Foster et al. (2008), USA, CDC, US Department of Agriculture/Food and Nutrition Service [61] CT/NR 1349 x Grades 4–6 students 2 years The School Nutrition Policy Initiative included the following components: school self-assessment, nutrition education, nutrition policy, social marketing, and parent outreach. Cross-curricular/Integrated learning X BMI (z score) .80 Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: 11.2 yrs Total Energy (kJ/day) .12
Total Fat (g/day) .12
FV Consumption (Servings/per day) .82
Gorely et al. (2009) UK, Great Run, Coca-Cola Company [62] CT/SCT 589 x students 40 weeks (Curriculum approach) Physical education lessons and homework tasks X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: 8.8 yrs Fun run event - FV Consumption (Servings/per day) NS
Knowledge of healthy lifestyle (MC Test) NS
Head (1974) USA, Emergency food and Medical Services [63] CT/NR 4,700 x Grades 5, 7 & 10 students 20 weeks Cross Curriculum approach in nutrition, reading, math, history, art, music and science X X Knowledge (% correct) <.05 Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: NR School lunch (% of plate waste) <.05
Acceptance of school served food (%) NS
Hendy et al. (2011) USA, grants from Penn State University [64] CT/SCT 382 x Grades 1–4 students 12 weeks Kid’s Choice Program (KCP), contingent reinforcement supported by parental involvement. X Eating FV first in meals <.001 Insufficient data reported for calculation
SDT Choosing low fat and low sugar drinks <.001
Hoffman et al. (2010) USA, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [65] CT/SLT 297 x Kindergarten & Grade 1 students 2 years Cross-Curricular program included school-wide, classroom, lunchroom, and family components X X Plate Waste Weight Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2
- Fruit intake(g) <.001 <.001 0.86 0.55 -
- Vegetable intake (g) <.01 NS 0.34  
James et al. (2005) UK, GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis, Pfizer, Florence Nightingale Foundation [33] CT/NR 644 x 2nd-6th Grade students 40 weeks (Curriculum approach) Reducing SLB consumption X 3-Day Consumption Diary
Mean age: 8.7 yrs Cross curricular approach in Health, Science, Music and Art - SLB Consumption (Servings) 0.02 0.83
Kipping (2010), UK, Department of Health [66] CT/SCT 393 x Grade 5 students 20 weeks (Curriculum approach) Eat Well Keep Moving program X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
BCT Mean age: 9.4 yrs - FV consumption (Servings/per day) NS
- Snack consumption (Servings/per day) NS
- HFF consumption (Servings/per day) NS
- SLB consumption (Servings/per day) NS
Kristjansdottir et al. (2010) Iceland, The University of Iceland, The Icelandic Centre for Research, Brim Seafood [67] CT/NR 171 x Grade 2 students 2 years (Curriculum approach) co developed with teachers and supported by homework, letters to parents and meetings with parents X X Food record by parents
Mean age: NR - FV consumption (g/day) <.001 0.93
- Fruit consumption (g/day) .001 0.62
- Vegetable consumption (g/day) <.001 1.35
Luepker et al. (1996) USA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [68] CT/NR 5106 x Grade 3 students 3 years (Curriculum Approach) (Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health-CATCH) X School Lunch Menu Analysis
Mean age: NR Enhanced PE and classroom health curricula. 28 additional schools received these components plus family education. - Total energy intake (MJ) <.001 0.02
24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake
- Total energy intake (MJ) .01 0.07
- Total energy from fat (%) .001 0.17
Health Behaviour Questionnaire
- Dietary knowledge <.001 0.25
Mangunkusumo et al. (2007) The Netherlands, Organisation for Health Research and Development [69] CT/NR 675 x 7th Grade students 12 weeks Internet-tailored advice followed by dietary counselling X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: 10.3 yrs -Vegetable consumption (g/per day) NS
- Behavioural determinants NS
Muth (2008) USA, American Medical Association [70] CT/SCT 73 x 4th Grade students 12 weeks (Curriculum approach) (Improving Meals and Physical Activity in Children and Teens (IMPACT) X X Texas School Physical Activity and Nutrition Questionnaire (SPAN)   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: 9.9 yrs Train-the-trainer model with HS students trained to teach 4th graders - FV Consumption (Servings/per day) .05
- Nutritional knowledge (%) .01
Panunzio et al. (2007) Italy, NR [71] CT/NR 471 x 4th Grade students 36 weeks (Curriculum approach) Teachers vs Nutritionists X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: 9.6 yrs - FV consumption (>1 serving p/day) <0.01
- Legume consumption (>1 serving p/day) <0.01
- Chips consumption (>1 serving p/day) <0.01
- SLB consumption (>1 serving p/day) <0.01
Parcel et al. (1989) USA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [72] CT/SLT 398 x K-4th Grade students 14 weeks (Curriculum approach) 3 concurrent programs: the New School Lunch, Children’s Active Physical Education (CAPE), and Go For Health classroom instruction. X Behavioural Capability Questionnaire
Mean age: NR - Diet behavioural capability (Score) <.01 0.89
- Diet self-efficacy (Score) NS 0.15
- Diet behavioural expectations (Score) <.01 0.73
Self-Reported Behaviour
- Salt use (Daily use) NS 0.00
- FV consumption (% of total intake) NS 0.13
Parmer (2009) USA, NR [73] CT/ELT 115 x 2nd Grade students 28 weeks (Curriculum approach) X X FV Survey (Likert Scale)
Mean age: 7.3 yrs Nutrition lessons + school garden - MyPyramid food groups NS 0.59
Experiential Learning (Gardening + Food Prep) - Nutrient–food association < .001 1.13
- Nutrient–job association < .001 0.99
- F V identification < .01 2.03
Researcher Observed Lunch Choices
- Vegetable choice (Servings) <.01 1.09
- Vegetable consumption (Servings) <.01 1.41
Perry et al. (1998) USA, National Cancer Institute [74] CT/SLT 441 x 4- 5th Grade students 40 weeks The 5-a-Day Power Plus Program X X Researcher Observed Lunch Choices   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: NR - behavioural curricula - FV consumption (Servings) <.001
- parental involvement/education - Vitamin A (μg) .02
- school food service changes - Vitamin C (mg) <.001
- industry involvement and support. 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake  
- Fruit consumption (Servings) .02
- Total fat consumption (%/kcal) .02
- Calcium (mg) .04
Health Behaviour Questionnaire  
- Asking for F V (LIkert Scale) .03
- Servings of FV (Nominal Scale) <.001
- Knowledge of servings (Nominal Scale) <.001
Perry, Mulis et al. (1985), USA, NR [75] CT/SLT 371 x 3rd-4th Grade students 10 weeks (Curriculum approach) Hearty Heart and Friends program X X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
PBT Mean age: NR - Sugared cereal consumption (Less) <.05
- Green vegetable consumption <.02
- Fruit consumption <.01
- Fried food consumption (Less) <.005
- Added salt consumption (Less) <.05
Powers et al. (2005), USA. State Cooperative Extension System and State Department of Human Resources [76] CT/SCT 1100 x 2nd- 3rd Grade students 6 weeks Pizza Please Board Game with Nutrition education X Dietary Consumption Behaviour (Self report frequency) <.001 0.23
Mean age: 7.6 yrs - Dairy consumption .001 0.22
- FV consumption .016 0.15
Nutrition Knowledge (Item matching) <.001 0.77
- Food appropriate Food Guide Pyramid <.001 0.31
- Nutrient-food association <.001 0.54
- Nutrient-job association <.001 0.60
Quinn et al. (2003) USA, Kappa Omicron Nu, Food Bank of Central New York [77] CT/NR 126 x 5th Grade students 40 weeks Experiential learning (Cooking) Modified CookShop program. Taught in schools with the support of parents X X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake & Food Frequency Questionnaire (NCI)
- Dietary Fibre (mg) <.05 0.33
- Folate (mcg) <.05 0.16
- Fruit consumption (Servings) <.05 0.28
- Milk consumption (Servings) <.001 0.47
Resnicow et al. (1998) USA, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [78] CT/SCT 966 x 4th - 5th Grade students 6 weeks (Curriculum approach) Gimme-5 curriculum. X - FV preference (Likert scale) <.001 Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age: NR Teachers received the teacher wellness program involving 54 workshops over 2 yrs (in favour of control)
Reynolds et al. (2000) USA, National Cancer Institute Grant [79] CT/SCT 1698 x 4th Grade students 2 years High 5 intervention on FV consumption based around 3 interventions: classroom component, Parent component, Food Service component. X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age:8.7 yrs - Fruit consumption (Servings) <.001
- Vegetables consumption (Servings) <.001
- FV consumption (Servings) <.001
- Calories from fat (%) <.041
- Calories from carbohydrates (%) <.017
- Fibre (g) <.012
- Folate (μg) <.034
- β-Catotine (μg) <.034
- Vitamin C (mg) <.048
Sahota et al. (2001) UK, Northern and Yorkshire Region Research and Development Unit [80] CT/NR 636 x 4th-5th Grade students Mean age: 8.4 yrs 40 weeks Active programme promoting lifestyle in schools (APPLES program) X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Insufficient data reported for calculation
Multidisciplinary, multiagency programme designed to influence diet and physical activity - Vegetable consumption <.05
Cross Curricular whole school community including parents, teachers, and catering staff
Shannon & Chen (1988), USA, Pennsylvania State Department of Education [81] CT/NR 1707 x 3rd Grade students 3 years (Curriculum approach) Nutrition in a Changing World (K-12 program). X X Knowledge (Test scores) <.001 Insufficient data reported for calculation
Mean age:NR Food attitudes (Likert scale) <.001
Eating behaviours (24 hr recall) <.001
Smolak et al. (1998), USA, Ohio Dept of Education[82] CT/NR 253 x 5th Grade students 24 weeks (Curriculum approach) Eating Smart, Eating for Me X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake   Boys Girls
Mean age: NR - Vegetable consumption (Servings) NS   
(<.05 by sex) −0.31 0.24
Spiegel & Foulk (2006), USA, Institute for America’s Health [83] CT/TRA 1013 x 4th-5th Grade students 24 weeks Wellness, Academics & You (WAY) Program X BMI (kg/m2) 0.01 −0.38
Mean age: NR Cross-curricular – Language arts, mathematics, science & health education FV Consumption (Survey) NS -
Taylor et al. (2007), New Zealand, NR[34] CT/NR 730 x primary students 2 years APPLE Project - Community driven healthy eating & physical activity initiative. Three-day recall intakes
Cross curricular school-based science nutrition lessons, recess activities & GoTri card game - SLB consumption (Servings) 0.04 −0.21
- Juice consumption (Servings) 0.03 −0.24
- Water consumption (Servings) 0.07 0.24
- Fruit consumption (Servings) <0.01 0.32
BMI (z-score) <0.05 −0.49
te Velde et al. (2007), The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Commission of European Communities (RTD) programme[84] CT/SCT 1472 x 5th-6th Grade students 52 weeks Pro-children intervention (Three countries) X 24 hr recall of Daily Dietary Intake
Mean age: 10.7 yrs - Curriculum approach (w/web based feedback tool) - FV consumption (g/d) All Countries <0.02 0.18
- Free FV provision in schools - FV consumption (g/d) Norway <0.05 0.37
- Family web based feedback tool - FV consumption (g/d) Spain <0.05 0.15
- FV consumption (g/d) The Netherlands <0.05 0.12

  1. TPB = Theory of Planned Behaviour; SCT = Social Cognitive Theory; CDT = Cognitive Development Theory; SLT = Social Learning Theory; BCT = Behavioural Choice Theory; CogT = Cognitive Theory; SDT = Self Determination Theory; GST = Group Socialization Theory; ELP = Experiential Learning Theory; PBT = Problem Behaviour Theory; TRA = Theory of Reasoned Action; RCT = Randomised controlled trial; QE = Quasi-experimental; CT = Cluster-controlled trial; NR = Not reported; NS = Not significant; FV = Fruit and vegetable; SLB = Sugar-laden beverages; HFSS = High fat, sugar & salt; HFF = High Fat Food; FF = Fast food, BMI = Body Mass Index.