In order to continue enjoying our site, we ask that you confirm your identity as a human. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
d. oppositional conditioning
d. behaviourist
d. contingent reinforcement
d. manipulation
d. observational learning
d. punishment
d. law of effect
d. negative reinforcement
d. ratio, interval
d. shaping
d. none of the above
d. the same stimulus
d. measure twice, cut once
d. decreases, increases
d. generalization
d. variable ratio
d. extinction
d. variable interval
d. secondary, primary
d. weakens, strengthens
d. each player has access to a lawyer
d. none of the above
d. ignore them
d. strong and irrational
d. latent learning
d. CR
d. CR
d. negative reinforcement
d. promotes random acts of kindness
d. discrimination
- c
- d
- a
- c
- b
- c
- d
- a
- d
- d
- b
- b
- c
- a
- d
- b
- c
- d
- c
- b
- a
- b
- c
- d
- c
- c
- c
- b
- b
- a
Which neurotransmitter is considered the major excitatory neurotransmitter? A. Glycine B. GABA C. Glutamate D. Serotonin QUESTION 2 Glia cells play a supportive role to the neuron. A few of the
Treatment adherence is affected by several different factors. Clinical factors include mood, anxiety, psychosis, and substance misuse. There are also patient factors such as knowledge, attitude, and
QUESTION 11 A patient arrives in the ED via EMS having a grand mal seizure. The ED physician instructs the RN to give 10 milligrams of Diazepam IV X1 dose STAT. The patient's seizure breaks within 2
Which of the following consists of all the known major neurotransmitters that are relevant in psychiatry? A.glutamate, GABA, dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine, histamine, steroids, nitric oxide
Which of the following statements below is NOT considered an appropriate treatment strategy for treatment-resistant depression? A) Sertraline+Bupropion B) Fluoxetine+Venlafaxine C)
The Draw-a-Person Test is LEAST useful for identifying _______. Group of answer choices high intellectual functioning low intellectual functioning average intellectual functioning children's
By Dr. Saul McLeod updated 2018
The law of effect principle developed by Edward Thorndike suggested that:
"responses that produce a satisfying effect in a particular situation become more likely to occur again in that situation, and responses that produce a discomforting effect become less likely to occur again in that situation (Gray, 2011, p. 108–109)."
Edward Thorndike (1898) is famous in psychology for his work on learning theory that lead to the development of operant conditioning within Behaviorism.
Whereas classical conditioning depends on developing associations between events, operant conditioning involves learning from the consequences of our behavior.
Skinner wasn’t the first psychologist to study learning by consequences. Indeed, Skinner's theory of operant conditioning is built on the ideas of Edward Thorndike.
Thorndike studied learning in animals (usually cats). He devised a classic experiment in which he used a puzzle box (see fig. 1) to empirically test the laws of learning.
Fig 1: Simplified graph of the result of the puzzle box experiment.
He placed a cat in the puzzle box, which was encourage to escape to reach a scrap of fish placed outside. Thorndike would put a cat into the box and time how long it took to escape. The cats experimented with different ways to escape the puzzle box and reach the fish.
Eventually they would stumble upon the lever which opened the cage. When it had escaped it was put in again, and once more the time it took to escape was noted. In successive trials the cats would learn that pressing the lever would have favorable consequences and they would adopt this behavior, becoming increasingly quick at pressing the lever.
Edward Thorndike put forward a “Law of effect” which stated that any behavior that is followed by pleasant consequences is likely to be repeated, and any behavior followed by unpleasant consequences is likely to be stopped.
Critical Evaluation
Thorndike (1905) introduced the concept of reinforcement and was the first to apply psychological principles to the area of learning.
His research led to many theories and laws of learning, such as operant conditioning. Skinner (1938), like Thorndike, put animals in boxes and observed them to see what they were able to learn.
The learning theories of Thorndike and Pavlov were later synthesized by Hull (1935). Thorndike's research drove comparative psychology for fifty years, and influenced countless psychologists over that period of time, and even still today.
Download this article as a PDF
How to reference this article:
McLeod, S. A. (2018, January 14). Edward Thorndike. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/edward-thorndike.html
APA Style References
Gray, P. (2011). Psychology (6th ed.) New York: Worth Publishers.
Hull, C. L. (1935). The conflicting psychologies of learning—a way out. Psychological Review, 42(6), 491.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.
Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 2(4), i-109.
Thorndike, E. L. (1905). The elements of psychology. New York: A. G. Seiler.
Download this article as a PDF
How to reference this article:
McLeod, S. A. (2018, January 14). Edward Thorndike. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/edward-thorndike.html
Home | About Us | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Contact Us
Simply Psychology's content is for informational and educational purposes only. Our website is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
© Simply Scholar Ltd - All rights reserved