Thornton T: Essential. Philosophy of Mental Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Google Scholar
Dickenson D: In two minds. A case book in psychiatric ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
Google Scholar
Widdershoven G, MacMillan J, Hope T, Van der Scheer L: Empirical ethics in psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Book Google Scholar
Bloch S, Green SA: Psychiatric ethics. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
Book Google Scholar
Radden J: The virtuous psychiatrist: character ethics in psychiatric practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
Google Scholar
Sadler JZ: Values and psychiatric diagnosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
Book Google Scholar
Sailas ES, Fenton M: Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illness.Cochrane Database Systematic Review 2000., 1: CD001163
Google Scholar
Salize HJ, Dressing H: Coercion, involuntary treatment and quality of mental health care.Curr Opin Psychiatry 2005, 18, 5:576–84.
Article Google Scholar
Muralidharan S, Fenton M: Containment strategies for people with serious mental illness.Cochrane Database Systematic Review 2006., 3: CD002084
Google Scholar
Kisely SR, Campbell LA, Preston NJ: Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.Cochrane Database Systematic Review 2011., 2: CD004408
Google Scholar
Georgieva I, Mulder CL, Whittington R: Evaluation of behavorial changes and subjective distress after exposure to coercive inpatient interventions.BMC Psychiatry 2012, 12:54. 10.1186/1471-244X-12-54
Article Google Scholar
Cowden TL, Cummings GG: Nursing theory and concept development: a theoretical model of clinical nurses’ intentions to stay in their current positions.J Adv Nurs 2012,68(7):1646–57. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05927.x
Article Google Scholar
Molewijk B, Verkerk M, Milius H, Widdershoven G: Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: process and outcome.Med Health Care and Philosophy 2008, 11:43–56. 10.1007/s11019-007-9103-1
Article Google Scholar
Molewijk B, Zadelhoff E, Lendemeijer B, Widdershoven G: Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care: improving moral competency of professionals and quality of care.Bioethica Forum 2008, 1:57–65.
Google Scholar
Weidema F, Molewijk B, Kamsteeg F, Widdershoven G: Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation.Nurs Ethics 2013, 6:617–31.
Article Google Scholar
Landeweer E PhD thesis. In Moral dynamics in mental health care. Fostering reflection and change regarding coercion and restraint. Amsterdam: Free University Medical Centre (VUmc), EMGO+; 2013.
Google Scholar
DuVal G, Clarridge B, Gensler G, Danis M: A national survey of U.S. internists’ experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation.J Gen Intern Med 2004,19(3):251–8. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21238.x
Article Google Scholar
Gjerberg E, Førde R, Pedersen R, Bollig G: Ethical challenges in the provision of end-of-life care in Norwegian nursing homes.Soc Sci Med 2010,71(4):677–84. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.059
Article Google Scholar
Lind M, Kaltiala-Heino R, Suominen T, Leino-Kilpi H, Valimaki M: Nurses’ ethical perceptions about coercion.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2004, 11:379–85. 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2004.00715.x
Article Google Scholar
Teeri S, Leino-Kilpi H, Valimaki M: Long-term nursing care of elderly people: identifying ethical problematic experiences among patients, relatives and nurses.Nurs Ethics 2006, 2:116–29.
Article Google Scholar
Hurst SA, Perrier A, Pegoraro R, Reiter-Theil S, Førde R, Slowther AM, et al.: Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors.J Med Ethics 2007,33(1):51–7. 10.1136/jme.2005.014266
Article Google Scholar
Hem MH, Molewijk B, Pedersen R: Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion. A focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care.BMC Med Ethics 2014, 15:82. 10.1186/1472-6939-15-82
Article Google Scholar
Bremberg S, Nilstun T: The variety of ethical issues in everyday practice. Interviews with Swedish GPs.Eur J Gen Pract 2001, 7:143–7. 10.3109/13814780109094333
Article Google Scholar
Sorta-Bilajac I, Bazˇdaric K, Brozovic B, Agich GJ: Croatian physicians’ and nurses’ experience with ethical issues in clinical practice.J Med Ethics 2008, 34:450–5. 10.1136/jme.2007.021402
Article Google Scholar
Hunink G, Van Leeuwen R, Jansen M, Jochemsen H: Moral issues in mentoring sessions.Nurs Ethics 2009,16(4):487–98. 10.1177/0969733009104611
Article Google Scholar
Hurst SA, Hull SC, DuVal G, Danis M: How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis.J Med Ethics 2005,31(1):7–14. 10.1136/jme.2003.005835
Article Google Scholar
Lillemoen L, Pedersen R: Ethical challenges and how to develop ethics support in primary health care.Nurs Ethics 2013,20(1):96–108. 10.1177/0969733012452687
Article Google Scholar
Appelbaum PS, Reiser SJ: Ethics rounds: a model for teaching ethics in the psychiatric setting.Hosp Community Psychiatry 1981,32(8):555–60.
Google Scholar
Hem MH, Pedersen R, Norvoll R, Molewijk B: Evaluating clinical ethics support in mental health care. A systematic literature review.Nursing Ethics 2014. Epub ahead of print
Google Scholar
Lillemoen L, Pedersen R: Ethics in municipal health services: working systematically with, and developing competence in ethics.Clinical Ethics 2013, 8:19–28. 10.1177/1477750912474763
Article Google Scholar
Weidema F PhD thesis. In Dialogue at work. Implementing moral case deliberation in a mental health care institution. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Free University Medical Centre; 2014.
Google Scholar
Dauwerse L, Weidema F, Abma T, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: Implicit and explicit clinical ethics support in the Netherlands: a mixed methods overview study.HEC Forum 2014,26(2):95–109. 10.1007/s10730-013-9224-2
Article Google Scholar
Morgan DL: Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1997.
Book Google Scholar
Kidd PS: Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research.Qual Health Res 2000, 10:293–308. 10.1177/104973200129118453
Article Google Scholar
Morgan D, Fellows C, Guevara H: Emergent approaches to focus group research. In Handbook of emergent methods. Edited by: Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P. New York: The Guildford Press; 2008:207–20.
Google Scholar
Miles M, Huberman AM: Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. London: SAGE publications; 1994.
Google Scholar
Stake RE: Qualitative case studies. In The sage handbook of qualitative research. Edited by: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:443–66.
Google Scholar
Kvale S, Brinkmann S: Interviews. Sage, Los Angeles, CA: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing; 2009.
Google Scholar
Førde R, Pedersen R: Clinical ethics committees in Norway. What do they do and does it makes a difference?Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2011, 20:398–395.
Article Google Scholar
Donaldson T, Fistein E, Dunn M: Case-based ethics seminars in medical ethics education: how medical students define and discuss moral problems.J Med Ethics 2010,36(12):816–20. 10.1136/jme.2010.036574
Article Google Scholar
Pelto-Piri V, Engström K, Engström I: Staffs’ perceptions of the ethical landscape in psychiatric inpatient care - a qualitative content analysis of ethical diaries.Clinical Ethics 2014, 1:45–52.
Article Google Scholar
DuVal G, Sartorius L, Clarridge B, Gensler G, Danis M: What triggers requests for ethics consultations?J Med Ethics 2001,27(suppl I):i24–9.
Article Google Scholar
Reiter-Theil S: The Freiburg approach to ethics consultation: process, outcome and competencies.J Med Ethics 2001,27(suppl I):i21–3.
Article Google Scholar
Lϋtzén K, Cronqvist A, Magnusson A, Andersson L: Moral stress: synthesis of a concept.Nurs Ethics 2003, 10:312–22. 10.1191/0969733003ne608oa
Article Google Scholar
Kälvemark S, Höglund AT, Hansson MG, Westerholm P, Arnetz B: Living with conflicts. Ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system.Soc Sci Med 2004, 58:1075–84. 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00279-X
Article Google Scholar
Laursen B, Hafen C: Future directions in the study of close relationships: conflict is bad (except when it’s not).Soc Dev 2010,19(4):858–72.
Article Google Scholar
Kellermanns FW, Floyd SW, Pearson AW, Spencer B: The contingent effect of constructive confrontation on the relationship between shared mental models and decisional quality.J Organiz Behav 2007, 29:119–37.
Article Google Scholar
Schippers MC, Den Hartog D, Koopman PL: Reflexivity in teams: a measure and correlates.Applied Psychology: an international review 2007,56(2):189–211. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00250.x
Article Google Scholar
Schippers MCC, West MA, Dawson JF: Team reflexivity and innovation: the moderating role of team context.J Manag 2012. (E-publication online: ; accessed 13th of January 2015); 0149206312441210. First published on April 17, 2012 http://jom.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/04/16/0149206312441210.full.pdf+html
Google Scholar
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/16/4/prepub
