What are beliefs and assumptions?

belief | assumption |

As nouns the difference between belief and assumption

is that belief is mental acceptance of a claim as likely true while assumption is the act of assuming]], or taking to or upon one's self; the act of [[take up|taking up or adopting.

(en noun)

  • Mental acceptance of a claim as likely true.
  • *{{quote-magazine, date=2013-12-06, author=(George Monbiot)
  • , volume=189, issue=26, page=48, magazine=(The Guardian Weekly) , title= Why I'm eating my words on veganism – again , passage=The belief that there is no conflict between [livestock] farming and arable production also seems to be unfounded: by preventing the growth of trees and other deep vegetation in the hills and by compacting the soil, grazing animals cause a cycle of flash floods and drought, sporadically drowning good land downstream and reducing the supply of irrigation water.}}
  • Faith or trust in the reality of something; often based upon one's own reasoning, trust in a claim, desire of actuality, and/or evidence considered.
  • (countable) Something believed.
  • (uncountable) The quality or state of believing.
  • (uncountable) Religious faith.
  • (in the plural) One's religious or moral convictions.
  • * * beyond belief * disbelief * self-belief * unbelief

    (en noun)

  • The act of assuming]], or taking to or upon one's self; the act of [[take up, taking up or adopting.
  • His assumption of secretarial duties was timely.
  • The act of taking for granted, or supposing a thing without proof; a supposition; an unwarrantable claim.
  • Their assumption of his guilt disqualified them from jury duty.
  • The thing supposed; a postulate, or proposition assumed; a supposition.
  • * {{quote-journal, year=1976, author=, title=The Journal of Aesthetic Education, Volume 10 citation
  • , passage=No doubt a finite evaluative argument must make some unargued evaluative assumptions, just as finite factual arguments must make some unargued factual assumptions.}}
  • (logic) The minor or second proposition in a categorical syllogism.
  • The taking of a person up into heaven.
  • A festival in honor of the ascent of the Virgin Mary into heaven.
  • (rhetoric) Assumptio.
  • Beliefs are the convictions that we generally hold to be true, usually without actual proof or evidence and are basically assumptions that we make about ourselves, other in the world and how we expect things to be. Beliefs are about how we think things really are, what we think is really true and what therefore expect as likely consequences that will follow from our behavior. Beliefs are often, but not always connected to religion. Our beliefs grow from what we see, hear, experience, read and think about. From these things we develop an opinion that we hold to be true and unmovable at that time. Additionally they can be Empowering Beliefs, which are related to excellence and how it could be achieved, or Limiting Beliefs, where your behavior is not what you want, but you think you cannot change it.

    The key to changing your belief system is changing your thoughts. Orison Swett Marden wrote in How to Get What You Want, “Stop thinking trouble if you want to attract its opposite; stop thinking poverty if you wish to attract plenty. Refuse to have anything to do with the things you fear, the things you do not want.”

    Values stem from our beliefs, are things that we deem important and are about how we think things ought to be or people ought to behave. Values can include concepts like equality, honesty, education, effort, perseverance, loyalty, faithfulness, conservation of the environment and many, many other concepts. Values govern the way we behave, communicate, and interact with others.

    It is possible for our beliefs and values to differ over time as we encounter evidence or have experiences that challenge our previously held views. Conversely our beliefs and values can also be strengthened by experience or evidence. Beliefs and values determine our attitudes and opinions.

    Morals are a system of beliefs that is taught for deciding good or bad as opposed to coming from within and are emotionally related for deciding right or wrong. Morals have more social value and acceptance than values, with a person being judged more for their moral character than their values. Morals are a motivation or a key for leading a good life in the right direction whereas value is imbibed within a person and can be bad or good depending on the person’s choice. Morals can be related to one’s religion, a political system or a business society, and are formed because of values rather than being determined by values.

    Assumptions are our long-learnt, automatic responses and established opinions. We are, ourselves, almost always unaware of the nature of our own basic assumptions, but they are enacted through our behavior – what we say and do. Basic assumptions are usually rooted in our infancy, early family life and social context. More widely, assumptions shaping our behavior relate to cultural context.

    Attitudes are our learned ways of responding to people and situations based on the beliefs, values and assumptions we hold. Attitudes become manifest through our behavior.

    References:
    Kotelnikov, V. (n.d.). Personal Beliefs, Values, Basic Assumptions and Attitudes. Retrieved April 4, 2012 from //www.1000ventures.com/business_guide/crosscuttings/character_beliefs-values.html

    Manisha. (2009). Morals vs Values. Retrieved April 4, 2012 from

    Difference Between Morals and Values

    Rachel. (2011). Values vs Beliefs. Retrieved April 4, 2012 from

    Difference Between Values and Beliefs

    In further reflecting on our conversation at the Lab last month, I found myself wanting to deepen my understanding of what exactly we even mean by ‘assumption’.

    According to the Oxford dictionary, an assumption is ‘a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof’. What struck me about this definition is that it presupposes that we’re conscious of our assumptions. Certainly in many situations this is true – like the explicit assumptions we make about market growth projections. But there are many other cases where we’re not even aware that we’ve made an assumption.

    And it’s these subconscious implicit assumptions that are arguably far more powerful and potentially dangerous, precisely because we aren’t necessarily aware of their existence.

    These types of assumptions are actually better captured by the Oxford’s definition of a ‘belief’ as ‘something one accepts as true or real; a firmly held opinion’. And indeed, our subconscious assumptions often do stem from our core beliefs. Beliefs about who we are, or are not. Beliefs about what we can or can’t do. And beliefs about what we think is likely to happen to us, or not happen.

    Recently, during one of my own professional supervision sessions, I had a powerful insight into some of my own implicit assumptions.

    In reflecting with my supervisor about recent client coaching sessions, I realized that I often have an urge to understand my clients’ stories in detail. An urge my supervisor doesn't share. In reflecting further with him, and delving down into the chain of inferences that stemmed from this realization, it became clear to me that this urge of mine is anchored in a belief that if I don’t understand everything, I won’t be able to adequately add value for my client.

    In pushing the reflection further, I came to an even more revealing insight. By comparing our respective degrees of ‘needing to understand’, my supervisor and I realized that we held distinctly different assumptions about our ability to understand. My supervisor tends to trust that in time, he’ll come to understand, whereas I tend to fear that I might not…

    Why does it matter that I uncovered this particular set of assumptions?

    It matters because these core beliefs – at times – create unnecessary anxiety for me. And in addition my assumptions unhelpfully lead me to overly focus on the content of my client’s story, whereas at times it might in fact be more productive to focus on other elements of the conversation.

    So let me ask you a few questions to help uncover some of your own implicit assumptions.

    Let’s start with some key concepts such as ‘power’, ‘authority’ and ‘money’.

    • What is your relationship to authority? What are your underlying assumptions about authority? Where do these assumptions come from? How might these assumptions be showing up in your work environment? Or at home?
    • What is your understanding of power? What are your underlying assumptions about power? Where might they come from?
    • What is your relationship with money? Do you fear that you’ll lack money at some point in your life, or do you feel confident that you’ll always have enough? Where might this belief come from?

    Ultimately, bringing these deep assumptions to the surface is critical. They can have significant influence in terms of the paths we choose, and in the success we ultimately have once we go down a particular path.

    So, bringing our conversation back to where it started, which assumptions are helping us in our careers, and which are not?

    It’s actually pretty simple.

    The helpful assumptions and beliefs are those that make us believe we can successfully travel down the path we most want. Typically, these are beliefs about us having what it takes to become a good leader. Or beliefs that the organisations we work within will support our growth and our drive.

    The unhelpful assumptions and beliefs are those that lead us to believe we can’t go down our chosen paths, or are unlikely to succeed if we do. One powerful example is any belief that promotes the idea that leaders are born rather than made.

    And while we’re on the topic, there’s extensive research these days showing that there isn’t just one type of ideal leader. It all depends on context. Yes, our genes might help us in some contexts, and may in turn help us to become an ‘emergent’ leader. But there’s no guarantee that the genes we’re born into will make us an effective leader (HBR article "Asking whether leaders are born or made is the wrong question"). 

    What matters more when it comes to being an effective leader is the mindset we bring. Such as the desire to learn and to improve. Or the ability to adjust to our changing contexts. And in particular, the ability to adjust to the different types of people we lead. Leading a 45 year-old Gen Xer doesn’t require the same skills as leading a 30 year-old Gen Yer. And leading a team of experts doesn’t require the same skills as leading a sales team. As our friend and social media specialist John Dobbin said at the last Lab event, the definition of a good leader is itself a ‘morphistic’ concept.

    We can always go a step deeper in our journey of self-awareness. Reflecting with others can help us uncover some of our deeply held beliefs and give us an opportunity to challenge them against the beliefs of others. 

    So let’s keep thinking together…

    The Lab is an invitation only event. If you want to join the conversation, drop us a line at .

    Sandra is a founder of Leadership Partners and co-facilitates these events with fellow founder Tim Laporte.

    This blog is edited by Talia Gill, our brilliant communications specialist :-)

    Última postagem

    Tag