Rights are the most important priority in the Weber model of ethics decision making 1 word

  • Adler, N. J. (2015). Finding beauty in a fractured world: Art inspires leaders—Leaders change the world. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 480–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1974). Factors influencing intentions and the intention-behavior relation. Human relations. . Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzola, M. (2012). The possibility of virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 377–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E., & Bento, R. F. (2018). From laurels to learners: Leadership with virtue. Journal of Management Development.

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2018a). Sensuous learning: What is it and why it matters in addressing the ineptitude in professional practice. In E. P. Antonacopoulou & S. S. Taylor (Eds.), Sensuous learning for practical judgment in professional practice: Volume 1: Arts-based methods. (pp. 13–44). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2018b). Energising critique in action and in learning. The GNOSIS 4R framework. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 15(2), 102–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J., House, R. J., & Simonton, D. K. (2017). Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1003–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1999). The Nicomachean ethics (Rev.). . Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, & Apostle, H. G. (1984). Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics. . Peripatetic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arjoon, S. (2010). Aristotelian-thomistic virtue ethics, emotional intelligence and decision-making. Advances in Management, 3(4), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Kimmel, S. K. (1995). A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal-directed behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(4), 437–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. . Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. . Worth Publishers, Macmillan Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S., & Beck-Dudley, C. L. (2005). Designing ethical organizations: Avoiding the long-term negative effects of rewards and punishments. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(4), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S., & Near, J. P. (1991). Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Exline, J. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1165–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Speckart, G. (1979). Models of attitude–behavior relations. Psychological Review, 86(5), 452–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, C. (2004). Phronesis: A model for pedagogical reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(4), 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. . American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3(2), 178–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (2004). Moral functioning: Moral understanding and personality. In D. K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self, and identity. (pp. 335–347). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (2005). Character psychology and character education. In D. K. Lapsley & C. Power (Eds.), (pp. 67–100). University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Bok, H. (2008). Acting without choosing. Noûs, 30(2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortolotti. (2011). Does reflection lead to wise choices? Philosophical Explorations, 14(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2011.594962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, E. M., & Fales, A. W. (1983). Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D. S., Winn, B. A., & Kanov, J. (2014). Reconsidering virtue: Differences of perspective in virtue ethics and the positive social sciences. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(4), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, K. D., Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human relations. . Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, A., Crossan, M. M., & Seijts, G. H. (2018). The development of leader character through crucible moments. Journal of Management Education, 42(2), 265–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camillus, J. C. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, L. B., Wotruba, T. R., & Loe, T. W. (2003). Ethics code and usefulness: Familiarity views on idealist and relativist managers under varying of turbulence conditions. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A., Fehr, E., & Maréchal, M. A. (2014). Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature, 516, 86–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. . Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., & McMillan, B. (1999). Interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour: Studying cannabis use. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, J. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M., Byrne, A., Seijts, G. H., Reno, M., Monzani, L., et al. (2017). Toward a framework of leader character in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 7(2004), forthcoming.

  • Crossan, M., Cote, S., Virgin, S. (2020). Elevating character alongside competence in selection: A case study of canada revenue agency, organizational dynamics.

  • Crossan, M., Ellis, C., & Crossan, C. (2018). Activating Leadership Character Through Music. In S. S. Taylor & E. P. Antonacopoulou (Eds.), Sensuous learning for practical judgment in professional practice. Palgrave Studies in Business Arts and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., & Seijts, G. H. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in intuition managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Batson, D. (1973). “ From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R. (1987). Moral reasoning in work-related conflicts. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 9, 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Vol. 8).

  • Dionysiou, D. D., & Tsoukas, H. (2013). Understanding the (re) creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J. (1998). Persons, situations, and virtue ethics. Noûs, 32(4), 504–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. . Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., & Loken, B. (1989). Ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19, 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. . Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, P. (2013). The confessions of Andy Fastow. Fortune. http://fortune.com/2013/07/01/the-confessions-of-andy-fastow/.

  • Elm, D. R., & Weber, J. (1994). Measuring moral judgment: The moral judgment interview or the defining issues test? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, I., & Sison, A. J. G. (2014). A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics, 23(4), 375–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (2010). Judgment and decision making. Prentice-Hall, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (2013). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A. (2004). Business ethics: A study of the moral reasoning of selected business managers and the influence of organizational ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M. C. (2010). Giving voice to values: How to speak your mind when you know what? s right. . Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. . Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond “heuristics and biases.” European Review of Social Psychology, 2(1), 83–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1996). Rationality: Why social context matters. In P. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition. (pp. 319–346). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. . Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 708–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. (2013). Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5), 675–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, G., Colantonio, A., Davis, G. M., Shephard, R. J., & Simard, C. (1986). Prediction of leisure time exercise behavior among a group of lower-limb disabled adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 272–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. (2007). Facilitating management learning: Developing critical reflection through reflective tools. Management Learning, 38(5), 495–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. . Elsevier Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 663–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. A. (2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30(3), 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. M. (2013). Virtue in business: Conversations with Aristotle. . Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. . Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, A., Power, C., & Kohlberg, L. (1984). The relationship of moral atmosphere to judgments of responsibility. Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development, 74–106.

  • Hill, A., & Stewart, I. (1999). Character education in business schools: Pedagogical strategies. Teaching Business Ethics, 3(2), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1978). A treatise on human nature. . Oxford University Press (Original work published 1739).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jane, D., Worline, M., Frost, P., & Lilius, J. (2006). Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), 59–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. (2007). The evolution of morality. . MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. Q. (2001). Is a leader’s character culture-bound or culture-free? An empirical comparison of the character traits of American and Taiwanese CEOs. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behavior by unraveling ethical culture. Human Relations, 64(6), 843–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, E., Kothari, R. K., & Pan, C.-S. (1995). Safety in developing countries: Professional and bureaucratic problems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(September), 261–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). The meaning and measurement of moral development. . Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief. (pp. 261–277). Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., Mansfield, P., & Loc, T. W. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business a review of empirical studies assessing ethical Linda FMDL decision making in business Phylis Mansfield. Source Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. . Notre Dame University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2219228.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, A. (1984). A study in moral theory. . University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory. . University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantere, S., & Ketokivi, M. (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcoux, B. C., & Shope, J. T. (1997). Application of the theory of planned behavior to adolescent use and misuse of alcohol. Health Education Research, 12(3), 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J., & McFetridge, I. G. (1978). Are moral requirements hypothetical imperatives? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 52, 13–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., & Cooke, A. D. J. (1998). Judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 447–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, M. (2000). Virtue ethics and situationist personality psychology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 3(4), 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1998). On critical reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(3), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. M. (2006). Accounting ethics education: Integrating reflective learning and virtue ethics. Journal of Accounting Education, 24(2–3), 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monin, B., & Jordan, A. H. (2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 341–354).

  • Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2015). Approach, ability, aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 235–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2017). Virtue at work: Ethics for individuals, managers, and organizations. . Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A., Rehbein, K. A., Hosselni, J. C., & Armacost, R. L. (1995). A test of environmental, situational, and personal influences on the ethical intentions of CEOs. Business & Society, 34(2), 119–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P. D., Hersey, J. C., & Iverson, D. C. (1987). Health behavior models compared. Social Science & Medicine, 24(11), 973–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1999). Longitudinal improvement of self-regulation through practice: Building self-control strength through repeated exercise. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(4), 446–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2005). The psychological foundations of everyday morality and moral expertise. In: Character psychology and character education (pp. 140–165).

  • Narvez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). Moral identity, moral functioning, and the development of moral character. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 237–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Chia, R., Holt, R., & Peltokorpi, V. (2014). Wisdom, management and organization. Management Learning, 45(4), 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, P., & Smith, L. (1995). The theory of planned behaviour and exercise: An investigation into the role of prior behaviour, behavioural intentions and attitude variability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(4), 403–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. . Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. (2003). The relationship between ethical pressure, relativistic moral beliefs and organizational commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(6), 557–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1965). The stages of the intellectual development of the child. Educational Psychology in Context: Readings for Future Teachers, 63, 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H., & Conant, J. (1990). Realism with a human face. . Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raelin, J. A. (2001). Public reflection as the basis of learning. Management Learning, 32(1), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reno, M., & Crossan, M. M. (2017). Integrity as wholeness of character. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Rest, J. (1984). Researh on moral development: Implications for training counseling psychologists. Counseling Psychologist, 12(3), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. . Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., & Narvez, D. (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. . Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. J., Dang, C. T., Yam, K. C., & Leavitt, K. (2014). The role of moral knowledge in everyday immorality: What does it matter if I know what is right? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigg, C. (2018). Somatic learning: Bringing the body into critical reflection. Management Learning, 49(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507617729973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruedy, N. E., Moore, C., Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2013). The cheater’s high: The unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D., & Teece, D. J. (1991). Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler-Smith, E. (2012). Before virtue: Biology, brain, behavior, and the “Moral Sense.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality’. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practicioner: How professionals think in action. . Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seijts, G. H., Crossan, M. M., & Carleton, E. (2017). Embedding leader character into HR practices to achieve sustained excellence. . Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2014). In Search of phronesis: Leadership and the art of judgment. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13(2), 224–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Rao, C. P., & Vitell, S. J. (1996). Ethical decision making: An investigation of services marketing professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 635–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. J. G., & Fontrodona, J. (2013). Participating in the common good of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosik, J. J., Chun, J. U., Ete, Z., Arenas, F. J., & Scherer, J. A. (2019). Self-control puts character into action: Examining how leader character strengths and ethical leadership relate to leader outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. (1998). Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62(April), 92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, G. (2002). Mind association errors about errors: Virtue theory and trait attribution. Mind, 111(441), 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E. (1978). Positive social behavior and morality: Vol. 1. Social and personal influences. . Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Intelligence and wisdom. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. (pp. 631–649). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, I. (2012). Arts-based methods in leadership development: Affording aesthetic workspaces, reflexivity and memories with momentum. Management Learning, 44(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1317–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szwajkowski, E. (1985). Organizational illegality: Theoretical integration and illustrative application. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 684–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self- deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). 13 ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, L. P. (2006). The heart of judgment: Practical wisdom, neuroscience, and narrative. . Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, V. (2008). The reflective life: Living wisely with our limits. . Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Towler, G., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Application of Fishbein and Ajzen’s expectancy-value model to understanding fat intake. Appetite, 18(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trehan, K., & Rigg, C. (2015). Enacting critical learning: Power, politics and emotions at work. Studies in Higher Education, 40(5), 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1992). Moral reasoning and business ethics: Implications for research, education, and management. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(1969), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E., & Smetana, J. (1984). Social knowledge and action: The coordination of domains. Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development, 261–282.

  • Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Diermeier, D. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2003). Ethical reasoning in an equitable relief innocent spouse context. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024111814533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Staveren, I. (2007). Beyond utilitarianism and deontology: Ethics in economics. Review of Political Economy, 19(1), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1982). Toward understanding unlawful organizational behavior. Michigan Law Review, 80(7), 1377–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R. (2006). Virtue in organizations: Moral identity as a foundation for moral agency. Organization Studies, 27(3), 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Reynolds, S. J., & Brown, M. E. (2014). Moral intuition: Connecting current knowledge to future organizational research and practice. Journal of Management, 40(1), 100–129.

  • Weber, J. (1990). Managers’ moral reasoning: Assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Human Relations, 43(7), 687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf, R., & Tobias-Miersch, Y. (2016). Whistleblowing, parrhesia and the contestation of truth in the workplace. Organization Studies, 37(11), 1621–1640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, T. J. (2001). How virtue fits within business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D., & Tsoukas, H. (2009). What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1339–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 


Page 2

From: Character-Infused Ethical Decision Making

Dimension Definition
Judgment Makes sound decisions in a timely manner based on relevant information and critical analysis of facts. Appreciates the broader context when reaching decisions. Shows flexibility when confronted with new information or situations. Has an implicit sense of the best way to proceed. Sees into the heart of challenging issues. Reasons effectively in uncertain or ambiguous situations
Courage Does the right thing even though it may be unpopular, actively discouraged, and/or result in a negative outcome for him/her. Shows an unrelenting determination, confidence, and perseverance in confronting difficult situations. Rebounds quickly from setbacks
Drive Strives for excellence. Has a strong desire to succeed. Tackles problems with a sense of urgency. Approaches challenges with energy and passion
Collaboration Values and actively supports development and maintenance of positive relationships among people. Encourages open dialogue and does not react defensively when challenged. Is able to connect with others at a fundamental level, in a way that fosters the productive sharing of ideas. Recognizes that what happens to someone, somewhere, can affect all
Integrity Holds oneself to a high moral standard and behaves consistently with ethical standards, even in difficult situations. Is seen by others as behaving in a way that is consistent with their personal values and beliefs. Behaves consistently with organizational policies and practices
Temperance Conducts oneself in a calm, composed manner. Maintains the ability to think clearly and responds reasonably in tense situations. Completes work and solves problems in a thoughtful, careful manner. Resists excesses and stays grounded
Accountability Willingly accepts responsibility for decisions and actions. Is willing to step up and take ownership of challenging issues. Reliably delivers on expectations. Can be counted on in tough situations
Justice Strives to ensure that individuals are treated fairly and that consequences (positive or negative) are commensurate with contributions. Remains objective and keeps personal biases to a minimum when making decisions. Provides others with the opportunity to voice their opinions on processes and procedures. Provides timely, specific, and candid explanations for decisions. Seeks to redress wrongdoings inside and outside the organization
Humility Lets accomplishments speak for themselves. Acknowledges limitations. Understands the importance of thoughtful examination of one's own opinions and ideas. Embraces opportunities for personal growth and development. Does not consider oneself to be more important or special than others. Is respectful of others. Understands and appreciates others’ strengths and contributions
Humanity Demonstrates genuine concern and care for others. Appreciates and identifies with others’ values, feelings, and beliefs. Has a capacity to forgive and not hold grudges. Understands that people are fallible and offers opportunities for individuals to learn from their mistakes
Transcendence Draws inspiration from excellence or appreciation of beauty in such areas as sports, music, arts, and design. Sees possibility where others do not. Has an expansive view of things both in terms of taking into account the long term and broad factors. Demonstrates a sense of purpose in life

  1. Adapted from “Toward a framework of leader character” by Crossan et al. (2017). Journal of Management Studies, 7. Copyright 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for the Advancement of Management Studies. Adapted with permission