Discuss why an understanding of the legal profession is necessary for the healthcare professional

🏠

Subjects

➗

🧪

🏛️

📺

🤝

💻

💰

📚

Resources

📓

🏆

💯

❓

🔀

🏢

🤝

🌎

In order to continue enjoying our site, we ask that you confirm your identity as a human. Thank you very much for your cooperation.

1. Dunn M. Contextualising consent. J Med Ethics 2016;42:67–8. 10.1136/medethics-2016-103381 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Mental Capacity Act. 2005. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/pdfs/ukpga_20050009_en.pdf

3. The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations. 2004. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1031/pdfs/uksi_20041031_en.pdf

4. Shepherd V. Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on ‘evidence biased’ medicine. BMC Med Ethics 2016;17:8 10.1186/s12910-016-0138-9 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Head MG, Walker SL, Nalabanda A, et al.. Researching Scabies Outbreaks among People in Residential Care and Lacking Capacity to Consent: A Case Study. Public Health Ethics 2017;10:90–5. 10.1093/phe/phv011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Dixon-Woods M, Angell EL. Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements? J Med Ethics 2009;35:377–81. 10.1136/jme.2008.027094 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Wood F, Prout H, Bayer A, et al.. Consent, including advanced consent, of older adults to research in care homes: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views in South Wales. Trials 2013;14:247 10.1186/1745-6215-14-247 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Whelan PJ, Walwyn R, Gaughran F, et al.. Impact of the demand for ’proxy assent' on recruitment to a randomised controlled trial of vaccination testing in care homes. J Med Ethics 2013;39:36–40. 10.1136/medethics-2011-100119 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Hood K, Nuttall J, Gillespie D, et al.. Probiotics for Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhoea (PAAD): a prospective observational study of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (including Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea) in care homes. Health Technol Assess 2014;18:1–84. 10.3310/hta18630 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Helmchen H, Hoppu K, Stock G, et al.. From exclusion to inclusion : improving clinical research in vulnerable populations; memorandum. 2014. https://edoc.bbaw.de/opus4-bbaw/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2290

11. Age UK. Improving later life: Understanding the oldest old. 2013. https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/reports-and-briefings/health-wellbeing/rb_feb13_understanding_the_oldest_old_improving_later_life.pdf

12. McFadyen J, Rankin J. The role of gatekeepers in research: learning from reflexivity and reflection. J Nurs Heal Care 2016. [Google Scholar]

13. Manthorpe J, Samsi K, Heath H, et al.. ‘Early days’: knowledge and use of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 by care home managers and staff. Dementia 2011;10:283–98. 10.1177/1471301211403970 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Stone K, Hotopf M, Koffman J, et al.. Morecare capacity: mental capacity and processes of consent for research on end-of-life care. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2013. [Google Scholar]

15. Bravo G, Pâquet M, Dubois MF. Knowledge of the legislation governing proxy consent to treatment and research. J Med Ethics 2003;29:44–50. 10.1136/jme.29.1.44 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Karlawish JH, Knopman D, Clark CM, et al.. Informed consent for Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials: a survey of clinical investigators. IRB 2002;24:1 10.2307/3563802 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Flick U. Designing qualitative research. London: SAGE, 2008. [Google Scholar]

18. Finch J. The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology 1987;21:105–14. 10.1177/0038038587021001008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Wainwright P, Gallagher A, Tompsett H, et al.. The use of vignettes within a Delphi exercise: a useful approach in empirical ethics? J Med Ethics 2010;36:656–60. 10.1136/jme.2010.036616 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Department of Constitutional Affairs. Mental capacity act 2005: Code of Practice: The Stationery Offi ce, 2007. [Google Scholar]

21. Edwards SJ. Vulnerable adults in research: a tale of two regulations LSE Centre for the Study of Human Rights event, 2007. http://www.lse.ac.uk/humanRights/aboutUs/articlesAndTranscripts/Testing_Medicines_Edwards.pdf (accessed 22 Nov 2017).

22. Samanta J. Lasting powers of attorney for healthcare under the mental capacity act 2005: enhanced prospective self-determination for future incapacity or a simulacrum? Med Law Rev 2009;17:377–409. 10.1093/medlaw/fwp018 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Berger JT. Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research? J Med Ethics 2011;37:45–9. 10.1136/jme.2010.037515 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Law E. Research in care homes issues of participation and citizenship. http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/25305/1/Emma Law Final version May 1st.pdf (accessed 22 Nov 2017).

25. Bravo G, Wildeman S, Dubois MF, et al.. Substitute consent practices in the face of uncertainty: a survey of Canadian researchers in aging. Int Psychogeriatr 2013;25:1821–30. 10.1017/S1041610213001336 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Page 2

Journal of Medical Ethics

Participant characteristics